Certified Information Privacy Manager (CIPM) 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

The Right Not To Be Subject to Fully Automated Decisions is fundamentally concerned with providing individuals with a safeguard against decisions that affect them being made solely by automated systems without any human oversight. This right ensures that individuals have the ability to request and receive a review of such decisions. This means that if a decision impacting an individual's rights, opportunities, or well-being is made solely by an automated system, they have the avenue to challenge that decision and ask for it to be evaluated by a human. This right is crucial in contexts such as credit scoring, hiring processes, and automated marketing, where completely automated decisions could lead to significant adverse effects for individuals without recourse for correction or appeal.

In contrast, other choices address different aspects of data privacy and individual rights. For example, the ability to opt out of data collection pertains to individuals controlling their personal information rather than focusing on the review of automated decisions. Protection against human intervention diminishes the core purpose of this right, which is to ensure human oversight when automated decisions are made. Access to transparent processes involving their data is also important, but it does not specifically address the review of decisions made automatically. Therefore, the emphasis on reviewing automated decisions captures the essence of this right.